1968 Omega Geneve 18k gold with sold gold strap that is part of the case.

Posts
8
Likes
11
My father bought this in 1968. I have the original reciept and boolket. I t is beautiful and in great condition but it is time to sell it. Can anyone point me in the right direction to discover its value and find a buyer please.

 
Posts
2,644
Likes
5,328
Nice looking watch. Looks like 9k both case and bracelet. Not 18k.
EBay no reserve auction it will achieve its market value. You can search EB completed auctions for past results. Bracelet will add value
 
Posts
12,841
Likes
22,166
Due to sky high gold prices, it will be worth slightly above gold value which won’t be insignificant.

I’d say get some cheap digital scales to confirm the weight, then put it on eBay in an auction with clear pictures, including one showing the weight.

It should sell for a couple of hundred more than a gold scrapper will give you.
 
Posts
12,841
Likes
22,166
I assume you’re in the UK (or the wqtxh looks like it at least originated in the UK with those hallmarks)
 
Posts
8
Likes
11
I assume you’re in the UK (or the wqtxh looks like it at least originated in the UK with those hallmarks)
I have a home in the UK but I live in Portugal at the moment. My father bought it in London on 30/10/1968 yet the Sn puts the serial number date date as 1970. The watch is actually 9ct Gold
 
Posts
12,841
Likes
22,166
Case and bracelet are both hallmarked for 9ct, with the case being London 1972 and the bracelet being 1973.
Do you have the papers showing the 68 date?
 
Posts
2,091
Likes
1,280
Problem with watches like this is that they’re sized to a set wrist size. Can’t add to lengthen. Can’t shorten or end won’t match with buckle.

Also 9kt. This was sold in commonwealth countries, but rest of the world not seen as real gold. 10kt is the minimum.

Buy a cheap digital scale and get a weight. Figure out scrap gold value and add 20% as it’s still useable. Ask for scrap + 20% for the possible quick sale
 
Posts
8
Likes
11
Problem with watches like this is that they’re sized to a set wrist size. Can’t add to lengthen. Can’t shorten or end won’t match with buckle.

Also 9kt. This was sold in commonwealth countries, but rest of the world not seen as real gold. 10kt is the minimum.

Buy a cheap digital scale and get a weight. Figure out scrap gold value and add 20% as it’s still useable. Ask for scrap + 20% for the possible quick sale
Case and bracelet are both hallmarked for 9ct, with the case being London 1972 and the bracelet being 1973.
Do you have the papers showing the 68 date?
Yes I have the original London Jewellers receipt dated 30.10.1968
 
Posts
12,841
Likes
22,166
Yes I have the original London Jewellers receipt dated 30.10.1968

And the serial number matches the serial number on the movement? The serial number charts are just approximations but it’s very unusual for a hallmark to be several years out.
 
Posts
5,990
Likes
9,275
And the serial number matches the serial number on the movement? The serial number charts are just approximations but it’s impossible for a hallmark to be several years out.
FIFY

@RichardHQV
If the hallmark was 68 and the watch sold in 72 then that would be ok - but you can’t sell a watch 4 years (or even 1 year) before the gold case was assayed.
As @Davidt suggests - perhaps check to see if the movt serial on the receipt matches that on the movt in the watch.
 
Posts
10,230
Likes
16,028
It's a nice thing and worth 4 figures but I think you'll be lucky to get much above the full spot gold price. As noted above, based on the date discrepancy the papers you have are clearly for a different watch since the watch was made 5 years later than 1968 and these fixed bracelet 1970s presentation or dress watches just don't make a much if any premium at present. Particularly as Don says in 9K which has less acceptance world wide than higher purities. You already know the net weight since I see a photo above with the movement and dial removed. Weigh the case in grams, multiply that number by £29 and you'll have a selling price. I can't see anyone offering much of a bump over that. Indeed a gold buyer would be 10-20% lower.

From experience of handling these, I suspect you are looking at circa 40-45g net so £1,150 - £1,300 would be my starting point.
Edited:
 
Posts
8
Likes
11
It's a nice thing and worth 4 figures but I think you'll be lucky to get much above the full spot gold price. As noted above, based on the date discrepancy the papers you have are clearly for a different watch since the watch was made 5 years later than 1968 and these fixed bracelet 1970s presentation or dress watches just don't make a much if any premium at present. Particularly as Don says in 9K which has less acceptance world wide than higher purities. You already know the net weight since I see a photo above with the movement and dial removed. Weigh the case in grams, multiply that number by £29 and you'll have a selling price. I can't see anyone offering much of a bump over that. Indeed a gold buyer would be 10-20% lower.

From experience of handling these, I suspect you are looking at circa 40-45g net so £1,150 - £1,300 would be my starting point.
I do not understand the 2 year date discrepancy. I was 14 years old and with my father when we bought it in London as his Birthday Present on 30.10.1968. It never left his possession until he died in 1996 and in my safe since then. The serial number on the Omega database says it should be a 1970 watch. One of life's mysteries. One thing for sure it will stay where it is and not sold for scrap value. On weight you are correct at 40g without movement. Cheers
 
Posts
12,841
Likes
22,166
If it belonged to my father I wouldn’t sell it either.

Do the papers list the serial number - 32,635677?

What other numbers are on the paperwork?
 
Posts
8
Likes
11
If it belonged to my father I wouldn’t sell it either.

Do the papers list the serial number - 32,635677?

What other numbers are on the paperwork?
Sadly no numbers on the receipt just the description.
Can you guess the sale price? We even go 10% discount.
To be honest it deserves to be worn and both my only son and I will never wear it.
I will find someone to love it.
 
Posts
10,230
Likes
16,028
I do not understand the 2 year date discrepancy. I was 14 years old and with my father when we bought it in London as his Birthday Present on 30.10.1968. It never left his possession until he died in 1996 and in my safe since then. The serial number on the Omega database says it should be a 1970 watch. One of life's mysteries. One thing for sure it will stay where it is and not sold for scrap value. On weight you are correct at 40g without movement. Cheers
The year discrepancy is greater than you suggest. The 2 London year hallmark letters on the case and bracelet are for 1972 and 1973 respectively. It is normal that the movement is slightly older than the case with a locally cased model so a ~1971 date there makes sense. It is inescapable here that the watch isn't as old as you think and certainly not from 1968. Memories play tricks. Perhaps this one was purchased in the mid '70s to replace an earlier one which was lost or damaged.
 
Posts
8
Likes
11
The year discrepancy is greater than you suggest. The 2 London year hallmark letters on the case and bracelet are for 1972 and 1973 respectively. It is normal that the movement is slightly older than the case with a locally cased model so a ~1971 date there makes sense. It is inescapable here that the watch isn't as old as you think and certainly not from 1968. Memories play tricks. Perhaps this one was purchased in the mid '70s to replace an earlier one which was lost or damaged.
Well the plot thickens. I looked at the paperwork and the S# on that is 26774431 which was made in 1968. The only time this watch was out of my sight was iI went to a jewellers to be cleaned in 1996. So I am totally confused and nobody alive to answer the mystery

 
Posts
5,990
Likes
9,275
This is what your father bought in 1968
ST 145.009
 
Posts
1,046
Likes
1,124
Yeah, those receipts are for a completely different watch. Too bad you don't have the Chronostop, it is a much cooler watch 😀

I'm guessing there were two watch purchases, and the wrong receipts got associated with the wrong one. The gold one is more likely a few years after 68.
 
Posts
8
Likes
11
Youare a genius and correct. I remember now. I just looked in his old box and found it the other watch and it works. That means no paperwork for the Geneve sadly so 1972 it is.

 
Posts
5,990
Likes
9,275
Youare a genius and correct. I remember now. I just looked in his old box and found it the other watch and it works. That means no paperwork for the Geneve sadly so 1972 it is.

excellent - well done!

(and your other watch is 1973 if the attached bracelet is original to the watch - which is likely)