Forums Latest Members
  1. SpeedyPhill Founder Of Aussie Cricket Blog Mark Waugh Universe Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    5,830
    Likes
    10,852
    [​IMG]

    1966 dial with close T Swiss Made text
    1967 caseback inscribed 145.012-67
    1968 Tritium (?) flat counter-weight chrono seconds hands
     
    ajn3323, J-Luc and davten like this.
  2. Davidt Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    10,413
    Likes
    18,110
    A Franken. Or at least a watch that's had a couple of parts changed.

    What's the serial?
     
  3. SpeedyPhill Founder Of Aussie Cricket Blog Mark Waugh Universe Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    5,830
    Likes
    10,852
    2667. range which would make it a late 1967 or judging the Tritium (?) hands a 1968 ...
    Not necessarily a Franken as these parts were available in 1967 ::confused2::
     
  4. ulackfocus Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,973
    SpeedyPhill's first thread of the new year is about a Speedy. Imagine that! ......and it's possibly a Shenanigans Speedmaster. We NEVER see shenanigans surrounding Speedmasters!

    edited to correct autocorrect. 001_rolleyes.gif
     
    Edited Jan 1, 2017
  5. watchknut New watch + Instagram + wife = dumbass Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    4,025
    Likes
    13,790
    My 145.012-67 has a flat sweep hand. My guess...it was what was in the parts bin!
     
    SpeedyPhill likes this.
  6. SpeedyPhill Founder Of Aussie Cricket Blog Mark Waugh Universe Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    5,830
    Likes
    10,852
    Well... first 2017 post was about a 1967 Omega booklet which came supposedly with the 145.012-67 pictured
    .
    [​IMG]
     
  7. SpeedyPhill Founder Of Aussie Cricket Blog Mark Waugh Universe Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    5,830
    Likes
    10,852
    Just checked Fratellowatches topic on 145.012-67 and there's a picture of about the same version;
    1966 close T Swiss made dial
    1967 caseback inscribed 145.012-67
    1966
    drop counter-weight chrono seconds hands
    ::popcorn::
    [​IMG]
     
  8. Davidt Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    10,413
    Likes
    18,110
    I could see the flat bottom Chrono hand, caseback and serial being original, but I can't see that close T dial being factory.
     
  9. Dgercp Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    1,072
    Likes
    1,454
    A perfectly correct 145.012 except for the dial which (correctness aside) is rather very nice.
     
  10. SpeedyPhill Founder Of Aussie Cricket Blog Mark Waugh Universe Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    5,830
    Likes
    10,852
  11. watchknut New watch + Instagram + wife = dumbass Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    4,025
    Likes
    13,790
    I'll stick with @Spacefruit site...those guides are pretty much spot on.
     
    Spacefruit likes this.
  12. Davidt Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    10,413
    Likes
    18,110
    i think you'll struggle to find anyone who thinks the dial is original, given the caseback and serial appear to match to a later 145.012.
     
    bhove likes this.
  13. SpeedyPhill Founder Of Aussie Cricket Blog Mark Waugh Universe Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    5,830
    Likes
    10,852
  14. watchknut New watch + Instagram + wife = dumbass Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    4,025
    Likes
    13,790
    Heres thinks it is "dodgy"...it is not an example that he is stating is a known variationot.
     
    SpeedyPhill likes this.
  15. Davidt Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    10,413
    Likes
    18,110
    The one that's headed "this next one is dodgy as hell"?

    Is it your watch or one you're looking at? It's a nice dial, but it's not original. It's for an earlier 105.012. Probably a 65 or early 66HF.
     
    mr_yossarian and Spacefruit like this.
  16. SpeedyPhill Founder Of Aussie Cricket Blog Mark Waugh Universe Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    5,830
    Likes
    10,852
    Indeed it shows rare combinations were made with vintage parts... However I still believe there's a chance that the combination in the original post could be correct as Omega used up all parts before production of the 861 versions :thumbsdown:
     
  17. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    Perhaps the serial number is 2607xxxx? I think 2667xxxx would put this watch in the 861 caliber range. 2655xxxx is, I believe, the line from 321 to 861.

    2607xxxx,however, is a very common 145.012-67 movement number series.
     
  18. Davidt Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    10,413
    Likes
    18,110
    Made by whom? Omega or a random watchmaker/individual? i could have my watchmaker put a mk2 dial in a 145.012. Rare? Yes. Correct. Of course not.

    Is there the slightest 0.001% chance this dial is original? Yes. But it's overehelming likely it's been swapped since it left the factory.
     
  19. SpeedyPhill Founder Of Aussie Cricket Blog Mark Waugh Universe Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    5,830
    Likes
    10,852
    I'm offered this watch. Checked again and the range is 2667.67xx which should be one of the very last 361 movements made before October 1968
    The close T 1966 dial remains an important issue
    .
    [​IMG]
     
  20. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    Do you have a pic. of this 266767xx 321 movement?