1964 Seamaster

Posts
2
Likes
2
Hi,

I have a 1964 Seamaster that belonged to my father. I remember the day he got it when I was 5...he was so proud.

Dad wore the watch daily until he passed in 1992, at which time my mom had the crystal replaced and she gave it to me. I've had it in a safety deposit box ever since. (I'm a Movado guy) Now, I'd like to wear his Omega but I have some questions. See photos.

Sometime in the 70's, Dad had the movement replaced with a quartz movement, which I believe was common for the time but devalued the watch. I'm not so concerned with the value as I am with the general consensus about these conversions. I have no idea if the quartz movement is genuine Omega or ???

The crystal seems to be odd and possibly just a generic replacement of some sort. I'd like to get this replaced with one that is closer to the original. How would I best go about that?

Finally, there is quite a bit of hand engraved numbering and whatnot on the inside of the back. Any ideas what any of these numbers mean? Or are they inspector sign offs?

Thank you for your time and feedback.

jerry grant
 
Posts
2,716
Likes
5,488
Is there a SWISS text at bottom of dial below 6:00? Cant see one but sometimes you need to look at an angle. The dial looks too pristine for the age and general condition of the case, I suspect it was replaced with a service dial or repainted when the movement was swapped. The text looks pretty good but just too dark and crisp for the age of watch to me- but originality is not the issue as the movement swap is done- if the watch runs well i would just wear and enjoy it- swapping the crystal will do little for it, as the present one looks clear, and spending more money on this watch makes no sense to me at this point- you can wear and enjoy it as is I think.

BTW the scratched markings inside the caseback are prior watchmaker initials and dates, and the printed text is the reference number indicating it was for US market and 14K gold filled
 
Posts
2,110
Likes
1,295
To fit the quarts movement. Most likely the dial posts were cut off and stuck on with glue dots to hold in place

Based on the KL6303. Movement could be a caliber 565

You would need to find a movement, hands, case clamps/screws. If the dial posts cut. Dial can be held in place with glue dots
 
Posts
23,373
Likes
51,995
The J with an arrow in the caseback refers to the Jonell company, who made the case for this watch. The watch was shipped to the US as an uncased movement to save on import duty. The fine markings inside the case-back are from previous services. The hands have been replaced, the dial re-lumed and probably repainted. The quartz movement appears to be generic. This type of conversion is not so common TBH, in fact this may be the first I've seen posted to the forum. Given all of these issues, I don't think I'd worry too much about the crystal.

Put a new battery in, and if it runs, wear it. I would not recommend going down the rabbit hole of a restoration on this watch.
 
Posts
2
Likes
2
Thank you all for your kind and thoughtful replies. While I'm not surprised that the watch has little monetary or historical value, I am happy to have learned more about it as it is special to me. My goal is to just wear it and pass it on to one of my kids when the time comes.

One thing - the crystal. The one on the watch feels overly "tall" and just doesn't look or feel right. I would like to get one closer to what was original. Any suggestions for how best to do that without over investing? Should I just take it to a good watchmaker?

Thank you again.
 
Posts
23,373
Likes
51,995
A watchmaker should be able to fit a generic crystal.
 
Posts
4,599
Likes
23,471
For what it's worth, that's what the crystal on my early 60's Seamaster with a Jonell case looks like.
Not sure if it is original or not...
 
Posts
50
Likes
49
Thank you all for your kind and thoughtful replies. While I'm not surprised that the watch has little monetary or historical value, I am happy to have learned more about it as it is special to me. My goal is to just wear it and pass it on to one of my kids when the time comes.

One thing - the crystal. The one on the watch feels overly "tall" and just doesn't look or feel right. I would like to get one closer to what was original. Any suggestions for how best to do that without over investing? Should I just take it to a good watchmaker?

Thank you again.

When my father passed, I too received some items that were far from showroom-ready. I opted not to dinker with them and I'm so glad I did. Every time I give them a glance (with the imperfections and all), I think of my father and smile. There's no way any retrofit or repair could have accomplished the same level of sentiment. That's just me....