1950's Omega Constellation Help Appreciated

Posts
21
Likes
3
MtV MtV
Welcome aboard!

I'm afraid what you have there is a mixture of parts. The case and dial dont belong with each other - my guess is it's a 2846 Seamaster case with the dial of a 2852 Constellation. You're right that the crown is also incorrect, but that's a minor issue in comparison.

Have it opened by a watchmaker and have him take a picture of the movement with the 3-digit caliber number and the 8-digit serial number clearly visible. This will help us determine if it's a chronometer rated movement that might be correct for the dial.

To recreate a "correct" watch, you'd need a 2852 case and crown, plus likely someone to service it while the dial is being transplanted. While it's possible to find those spare parts with patience, do note that this wouldn't make sense financially. If you want a great watch to wear and remember your late father, either have it serviced as is (after all, that's how your dad wore it) or source a correct Constellation case and second hand for it. But if you're intending to sell it, don't invest any money. Just have a watchmaker take movement and inside case back pics, maybe give it a bit of a careful cleaning. You won't get back the amount you'd have to invest to buy the Constellation parts you need.
 
Posts
21
Likes
3
More photos added if you can shed further light would be grateful
 
Posts
256
Likes
192
What would your dad want you to do?

Clean it up and add the seconds hand?

Clean it up, add the seconds hand, and replacement crown?

Replace the incorrect case?

Do nothing...?
 
Posts
21
Likes
3
He isn't here to decide I'm afraid. And I'm not sufficiently aware of the costs of the various options yet to aid my decision making, but you outline the options well and I'm grateful.
 
Posts
256
Likes
192
I didn't know your dad, of course, but the fact he never got the correct case makes me think he liked the watch the way it is.

I think a service and a seconds hand is probably the right call.
 
Posts
3,230
Likes
12,692
The case of your watch is from a „jumbo“ reference Seamaster. That also explains why we can see the dial edges in your pictures - the case was made for larger dials.

Personally, that would make me consider a replacement case. That being said: It‘s still your dads watch, so considering this is how he wore it does play a significant role.

If you need assistance with finding a suitable (as opposed to: any) watchmaker let us know. This is a pretty international place and usually there’s someone who can recommend someone good for a service at least in your country.
 
Posts
21
Likes
3
MtV MtV
The case of your watch is from a „jumbo“ reference Seamaster. That also explains why we can see the dial edges in your pictures - the case was made for larger dials.

Personally, that would make me consider a replacement case. That being said: It‘s still your dads watch, so considering this is how he wore it does play a significant role.

If you need assistance with finding a suitable (as opposed to: any) watchmaker let us know. This is a pretty international place and usually there’s someone who can recommend someone good for a service at least in your country.
 
Posts
21
Likes
3
Wow thanks, so the dial and movement are Constellation circa 1954? Put into a late 60's Seamaster (larger) case?
 
Posts
3,230
Likes
12,692
L ldft54
Wow thanks, so the dial and movement are Constellation circa 1954? Put into a late 60's Seamaster (larger) case?

Both case and dial are from first half of the 50s. The movement is chronometer certified so most likely correct for the Constellation. I can’t tell you which Constellation reference, though. Since it’s a bumper movement it’s not from a 2852 as I initially thought.
 
Posts
2,156
Likes
4,306
MtV MtV
Both case and dial are from first half of the 50s. The movement is chronometer certified so most likely correct for the Constellation. I can’t tell you which Constellation reference, though. Since it’s a bumper movement it’s not from a 2852 as I initially thought.
Could dial and movement have originated in 2652 case?
 
Posts
3,230
Likes
12,692
Could dial and movement have originated in 2652 case?

Or a 2782. I don’t know the serial ranges off the top of my head.
 
Posts
163
Likes
211
As others have said, keep even treasure the watch from your dad. Get it serviced/repaired and wear it with pleasure.
 
Posts
2,156
Likes
4,306
MtV MtV
Or a 2782. I don’t know the serial ranges off the top of my head.
Maybe more likely 2782 with applied OMEGA and SN 14.9? I read an earlier thread about "transitional" 2652 with applied OMEGA and SN in mid 14 mil range- Ive not found a SN cutoff for 2652 vs 2782 however.
 
Posts
21
Likes
3
MtV MtV
Both case and dial are from first half of the 50s. The movement is chronometer certified so most likely correct for the Constellation. I can’t tell you which Constellation reference, though. Since it’s a bumper movement it’s not from a 2852 as I initially thought.
So the jumbo seamaster used a case that had been around since the 50's
 
Posts
3,230
Likes
12,692
L ldft54
So the jumbo seamaster used a case that had been around since the 50's

I’m not entirely sure how to respond to this tbh. There are various different jumbo references for Seamasters. This particular one is from the first half of the 50s, and so are the Constellation movement and dial in it.
 
Posts
7,538
Likes
34,608
Are there no jumbo Seamaster 354 chronometer references.....if so then it could also just be a dial transplant?
 
Posts
21
Likes
3
MtV MtV
I’m not entirely sure how to respond to this tbh. There are various different jumbo references for Seamasters. This particular one is from the first half of the 50s, and so are the Constellation movement and dial in it.
 
Posts
21
Likes
3
Sorry, blown off course down the worm hole of the internet. Thanks for your patience and the reiteration. Best wishes