I am curious to hear what others think about this dial as there are a few details that look off to me. Firstly, the primary markers of the subdial are uniform in thickness. I would expect the cardinal markers to be slightly thicker than the rest. Secondly, the font of the signature appears incorrect for the early 1950s. For example, the pointed bottoms of the "N"s look more 1920s than 1950s. Below are Longines signatures from 1929 and 1948 respectively. Lastly, the numerals look uncharacteristic. The style is odd and more closely resembles this redial (below first) than this original dial (below second).