Forums Latest Members
  1. rolokr Sep 9, 2018

    Posts
    1,195
    Likes
    1,918
    I have never really seen another UG Tri-Compax with this style of case. Can anyone lead me to a set of correct hands ? What do collectors here on OF think of the case ? The third picture I'm trying to show the two facets on the top of the lugs. Sorry for the low quality of my pictures ! 20180909_215453.jpg
     
    20180909_215518.jpg 20180909_220057.jpg 20180909_215026.jpg 20180909_214504.jpg 20180909_214513.jpg
  2. ELV web Sep 9, 2018

    Posts
    2,668
    Likes
    24,651
    Looks like an HJ Case to me.
     
    rolokr likes this.
  3. rolokr Sep 9, 2018

    Posts
    1,195
    Likes
    1,918
    I've seen that case on a Compur, but never in a Tri-Compax ?
     
    Edited Sep 9, 2018
    Larry S likes this.
  4. bgrisso Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    3,125
    Likes
    6,882
    My first thought as well, looks like a fairly polished HJ case. What's the case size and cal? Should be easy to check the hammer hallmark on the caseback to verify 166. Looks like a nice dial.
     
  5. billving Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    559
    Likes
    324
    Doesn't and 815 serial predate the early tri compax?
     
  6. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    I don't believe ref 12420 is a TriCompax case - will check the database later
     
    Sherbie and Diabolik like this.
  7. rolokr Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    1,195
    Likes
    1,918
    Well, this example doesn't seem to be a modified case. Pushers for adjustments work perfectly. Nothing seems abnormal. I've had this watch in my collection for a very long time. Before the UG popularity of late.
     
  8. ELV web Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    2,668
    Likes
    24,651
    It would be quite hard to modify the HJ case to fit the date, month, moonphase buttons perfectly. However the case back I am not sure, they are probably interchangeable. But still why would someone do that?
     
  9. bgrisso Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    3,125
    Likes
    6,882
    I was going to say, if it's not a tri case, someone would have to do some impressive work with the 3 correctors
     
  10. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    They do look good, although the photo is not in sharp focus. For the sake of argument, though, what would be required? Would it not be possible for a watchmaker to put three holes of correct diameter in a gold case with acceptable tolerances?
     
    rolokr likes this.
  11. rolokr Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    1,195
    Likes
    1,918
    Pictures of the movement and inside of case.
     
    20180910_100621.jpg 20180910_101251.jpg 20180910_101713.jpg
    chronoboy64, ELV web and LouS like this.
  12. bgrisso Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    3,125
    Likes
    6,882
    Oh I'm not saying it can't be done, for sure, it's just the unbelievable trouble I go through trying to get even the most basic things done for my UG watches, if it was a MOD, I would love to hire this person to work for me. I've been waiting like 3 months just to try and get some very basic plating work done.

    You would need the donor correctors, both internal and external (I suppose those could have come with the mvmt). Seems like a lot of trouble to go through?
     
    Diabolik, rolokr and chronoboy64 like this.
  13. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    A look at the database shows five examples of ref 12420, all of them Compurs, serial numbers spanning 729449 to 815369. There are no Tri-Compaxes.

    The earliest Tri-Compax case number I have is 946808. I find no Tri-Compaxes in Henri Jeanneret cases

    The database is a personal venture of mine comprised of data from observed examples, and thus utterly incomplete.
     
  14. chronoboy64 Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    1,441
    Likes
    11,944
    So it is the earliest known costumized Tri Compax in the wild :D
     
    rolokr likes this.
  15. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    ...also customized :whistling:
     
    bgrisso and chronoboy64 like this.
  16. rolokr Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    1,195
    Likes
    1,918
    I think it's original UG Tri-Compax, doesn't look modified at all Lou, could it be a custom job from UG directly ? Pushers are perfectly aligned.
     
    Diabolik likes this.
  17. rolokr Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    1,195
    Likes
    1,918
    As UG goes it's somewhat unpredictable !
     
  18. guaranteed.rohu Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    1,179
    Likes
    6,064
    Looks cool! There are so many variations of these older watches it's hard to know for sure, but if legit looks great!
     
    rolokr likes this.
  19. rolokr Sep 10, 2018

    Posts
    1,195
    Likes
    1,918
    I've owned the watch for probably 20 years.
    UG was not that popular for somebody. to go to all of this work to produce this ?
     
  20. Larry S Color Commentator for the Hyperbole. Sep 11, 2018

    Posts
    12,529
    Likes
    49,745
    Just read this all the way through. Correctors don’t look factory made. Modified case?