18k Tri-Compax Unusual Lugs

Posts
1,195
Likes
1,979
I have never really seen another UG Tri-Compax with this style of case. Can anyone lead me to a set of correct hands ? What do collectors here on OF think of the case ? The third picture I'm trying to show the two facets on the top of the lugs. Sorry for the low quality of my pictures !
 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,979
Looks like an HJ Case to me.
I've seen that case on a Compur, but never in a Tri-Compax ?
Edited:
 
Posts
3,341
Likes
7,870
My first thought as well, looks like a fairly polished HJ case. What's the case size and cal? Should be easy to check the hammer hallmark on the caseback to verify 166. Looks like a nice dial.
 
Posts
6,713
Likes
18,567
I don't believe ref 12420 is a TriCompax case - will check the database later
 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,979
Well, this example doesn't seem to be a modified case. Pushers for adjustments work perfectly. Nothing seems abnormal. I've had this watch in my collection for a very long time. Before the UG popularity of late.
 
Posts
2,671
Likes
24,903
Doesn't and 815 serial predate the early tri compax?
It would be quite hard to modify the HJ case to fit the date, month, moonphase buttons perfectly. However the case back I am not sure, they are probably interchangeable. But still why would someone do that?
 
Posts
3,341
Likes
7,870
I was going to say, if it's not a tri case, someone would have to do some impressive work with the 3 correctors
 
Posts
6,713
Likes
18,567
I was going to say, if it's not a tri case, someone would have to do some impressive work with the 3 correctors

They do look good, although the photo is not in sharp focus. For the sake of argument, though, what would be required? Would it not be possible for a watchmaker to put three holes of correct diameter in a gold case with acceptable tolerances?
 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,979
I don't believe ref 12420 is a TriCompax case - will check the database later
Pictures of the movement and inside of case.
 
Posts
3,341
Likes
7,870
They do look good, although the photo is not in sharp focus. For the sake of argument, though, what would be required? Would it not be possible for a watchmaker to put three holes of correct diameter in a gold case with acceptable tolerances?

Oh I'm not saying it can't be done, for sure, it's just the unbelievable trouble I go through trying to get even the most basic things done for my UG watches, if it was a MOD, I would love to hire this person to work for me. I've been waiting like 3 months just to try and get some very basic plating work done.

You would need the donor correctors, both internal and external (I suppose those could have come with the mvmt). Seems like a lot of trouble to go through?
 
Posts
6,713
Likes
18,567
A look at the database shows five examples of ref 12420, all of them Compurs, serial numbers spanning 729449 to 815369. There are no Tri-Compaxes.

The earliest Tri-Compax case number I have is 946808. I find no Tri-Compaxes in Henri Jeanneret cases

The database is a personal venture of mine comprised of data from observed examples, and thus utterly incomplete.
 
Posts
6,713
Likes
18,567
So it is the earliest known costumized Tri Compax in the wild 😁
...also customized 😗
 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,979
I think it's original UG Tri-Compax, doesn't look modified at all Lou, could it be a custom job from UG directly ? Pushers are perfectly aligned.
 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,979
I think it's original UG Tri-Compax, doesn't look modified at all Lou, could it be a custom job from UG directly ? Pushers are perfectly aligned.
As UG goes it's somewhat unpredictable !
 
Posts
1,229
Likes
6,332
Looks cool! There are so many variations of these older watches it's hard to know for sure, but if legit looks great!
 
Posts
1,195
Likes
1,979
I've owned the watch for probably 20 years.
UG was not that popular for somebody. to go to all of this work to produce this ?
 
Posts
13,177
Likes
52,355
Just read this all the way through. Correctors don’t look factory made. Modified case?