Forums Latest Members
  1. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Feb 15, 2013

    Posts
    26,980
    Likes
    32,684
  2. Sherbie Feb 16, 2013

    Posts
    1,323
    Likes
    1,860
    That is quite charming, and agree, the dial could have yellowed somewhat. 3 piece case looks unpolished, but one of the lugs looks bent - quite a common issue on these, but should be easy to fix. Dial looks original to me.
     
  3. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Feb 16, 2013

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    I think these Moonphase Calendars are one of the relatively undervalued models in the UG catalog, probably because it's not a chronograph. Even so, the movement is of course from Martel, and in fact it is one of the few complicated watches that one can find with Martel branding as well after 1950, these latter going for much less money. That's ironic, since it is in fact an "in-house" movement for Martel. This one is from about 1946 based on the case number. I like the dial and the moonphase disc for original, but I don't think they are in much better shape than in the pics. Good pickup on the bent lug, Sherbie.
     
  4. Sherbie Feb 16, 2013

    Posts
    1,323
    Likes
    1,860
    That was an easy spot Lous, as mine Tri-c also has a slight bruise - 18 mm top lugs, vs 17 mm bottom lug distance. I'll get this sorted when it next goes in for a service.
     
  5. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Feb 17, 2013

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
  6. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Feb 17, 2013

    Posts
    26,980
    Likes
    32,684
    I didn't realise they were that small, the second ad says 32mm!?
     
  7. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Feb 17, 2013

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    The complicated watches from UG vary tremendously from about 32mm (some boys sizes even smaller) to 46mm, these last commanding huge price premiums. While I've only ever seen cal 291 in one size, the chronograph movements come in several sizes.