Forums Latest Members
  1. justwatching May 5, 2016

    Posts
    290
    Likes
    174
    hello everyone. I'm being offered a nice 145.022-69 with 29m serial number but according to the chronomaddox chart 69's should be in the 28m serial range and 29m is 70's. Is this minor discrepancy acceptable? Watch has a stepped dial with smooth caseback which fits a 69' reference. Thanks in advance.
     
    image.png
  2. Davidt May 5, 2016

    Posts
    10,414
    Likes
    18,116
    29mil is absolutely correct for a smooth backed 69. Should also have DoN bezel.
     
  3. Javi22 May 5, 2016

    Posts
    211
    Likes
    574
    This chart is not correct....


    [​IMG]
     
  4. Davidt May 5, 2016

    Posts
    10,414
    Likes
    18,116
    It's fine as an approximation. However, more accurate info is available for Speedmasters, such as MWO and speedmaster101.com
     
  5. Esmarch May 5, 2016

    Posts
    95
    Likes
    132
    I believe 29m is the 'most correct' serial range for early -69s, and those below are actually the 'discrepancies'.

    My -69ST has a 2960xxxx serial and a smooth back + DON bezel.

    Also, post pics of the watch in question!
     
  6. meganfox17 May 5, 2016

    Posts
    1,411
    Likes
    3,434
    [​IMG][​IMG]
     
    Edited May 5, 2016
    Miss_Bourginskay likes this.
  7. justwatching May 5, 2016

    Posts
    290
    Likes
    174
    Here are some pictures. The watch looks good and reasonably priced unless I'm not seeing something wrong with it. Does the lume look original?
     
    image.png image.png image.png image.png image.png
    Tritium and peatnick like this.
  8. Javi22 May 5, 2016

    Posts
    211
    Likes
    574
    Nice watch, go for it.;) do you have better pics from the Dial?

    Macros?
     
  9. siguzzi May 5, 2016

    Posts
    221
    Likes
    616
    +1. go for it.
    The list is correct if you look to Omega extract of archives. If you look on an extract with 29mil it will say February till mid of 1970. Thats absolutely correct for a caseback with -69. Most time the year of the caseback is one year earlier than the production date listet in the extract of archives.
     
  10. justwatching May 5, 2016

    Posts
    290
    Likes
    174
    Yeah I've been itching to pull the trigger but my current expenses is making me think twice. I forgot to mention seller is asking $4900. What do u guys think of the price?
     
  11. justwatching May 5, 2016

    Posts
    290
    Likes
    174
    Sorry that's all the pictures he supplied
     
  12. siguzzi May 5, 2016

    Posts
    221
    Likes
    616
    I think the telemeter bezel will lower the price in comparison to a DON bezel. But the Dial looks great.
     
  13. siguzzi May 5, 2016

    Posts
    221
    Likes
    616
    The rubber sealing ring shows that a service is necessary
     
  14. ibis888 May 5, 2016

    Posts
    332
    Likes
    205
    I believe that the chart is referring to the year of manufacture and not the reference of the case... most 145.022-69s were made in 1970 (I have one that was manufactured in late 1970 with a 30,xxx,xxx serial). As other have said, a 29,xxx,xxx serial is spot on.

    That's an interesting bezel on the watch.. I would verify that it's correct for the reference, I'm sure some of the experts will chime in. If it is correct, it probably adds value since it's rare.

    I like the patina on that watch too.. great condition.
     
  15. siguzzi May 5, 2016

    Posts
    221
    Likes
    616
    The telemeter bezel will be less valued then the DON
     
  16. Javi22 May 5, 2016

    Posts
    211
    Likes
    574
    If i compare a 145.022 from 68 between a 69 , i think i would prefer the 68er. Don Bezel, longer Indices and applied Logo.
    Maybe something like this one from Ebay.

    But the watch is more expensive::shy::

    Omega Speedmaster Chronograph Watch 1968 145022-68ST Pre Moon Raised Logo DialPurchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network

    I'm not the seller, because i'm from Europe ....:)
     
  17. Kringkily Omega Collector / Hunter May 5, 2016

    Posts
    5,505
    Likes
    4,781
    That is really steep for a non DoN bezel 69 Speedy. Bezel also doesnt look like an original vintage one but a modern replacement piece if I am not mistaken
     
  18. abrod520 May 5, 2016

    Posts
    11,261
    Likes
    35,476
    Serial number is correct, the watch was likely produced mid-1970. I have a -69 with a 28.42M serial produced in early January 1970.

    Price is pretty steep without DON, but it's also got a 1039 bracelet which I think might make up for some of the difference.
     
    sky21 likes this.
  19. Davidt May 5, 2016

    Posts
    10,414
    Likes
    18,116
    Hands and dial look original, but no way am I paying that price without the DoN it should have.

    I'd say someone's bought this, taken the DoN bezel for another watch and replaced it with a modern telemeter bezel as it's harder to differentiate between old and new. From what I've seen, this is a new one though.
     
    Illiknight likes this.
  20. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder May 5, 2016

    Posts
    5,201
    Likes
    23,015
    Its desperate for a service.

    I cannot tell if the black aound the case back lip is old gasket or corrosion.

    I don't trust any watch with a telemetre bezel, until weight of evidence pushes my opinion away from it being a Dealer watch that has been prepared for as little money as possible.

    2911xxxx often have brown dials, this one does not, but it does have a nice look to it. Its not totally black. (but no premium value)

    For me, its what might euphemistically be called Full Retail Price.

    In other words a motivated hunter could trawl ebay, find one needing a service and end up with a watch costing a fair bit less including the service the buyer would be in control of.

    That said, everything is in short supply at the moment. But as yet, I dont see -69's without DO90's trading at $4900 on this forum.
     
    Illiknight, sky21, siguzzi and 2 others like this.