An irritating title
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Omega-Spe...245653?hash=item1c5ad8db55:g:iVgAAOSw5VFWF~CdPurchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network

I think it is....

 

I would guess yes, relumed. Looks a little lumpy, and covers the painted markers a little too much. But I'm hardly ever right about lume. Probably looks ok on the wrist though.

 

To thick to be original

 

Also, the dial is not original to the watch.

 

As well as the hands.

 

@watchtinker I'm not sure about that - I've seen original 65's with B&P's, serials that are good but near the 65-66 transition, and have and the '66 dial with wider T's. Agreed that this one looks relumed but it also seems quite possible that Omega overlapped a little bit. Not that it's gospel but it seems consistent with the rest of the practice variations of that happened around then. Would love to hear others opinions though.

Cheers---

 

The serial number in the 22 millions is too low to allow a dial with wider T's.
The problem is that all the recent attention to these timepieces has led to asubstantial growth of put-togethers.

Cheers.

 

Except on closer inspection the serial is out of my observations for a 105.012-65

This is 2262 9765 and by my (admittedly amateur) reckoning, a -65 starts at 2282 xxxx.

(http://speedmaster101.com/serial-quick-reference-to-78/)

Now its close, but sometimes close is what the assemblers get.

I dont know, but I am not buying.

 

Thanks guys - I should've clarified that I'm not speaking to the authenticity of all the parts of this watch in particular (the pushers looks a bit long to me from the picture, for example), just that the dial having the T's from the 66 in a late 65 (all else being correct) shouldn't always illicit a cry of foul. I agree that this guy looks suspicious for a few reasons but I think if the other parts check out then I'm not sure if the dial is 'wrong.' But like all things it's good to do your home work and I agree with master @Spacefruit , I am not bidding. I'll see if I can get pictures of the '65's I'm talking about for you all to see.

 

Pushers look 145.012-67 ish

 

The dial alone, I would be on the fence but the fact this has the flat chrono second hand matching lume makes it more than a suspect to me.

 

Yes, relumed and was not good job, tritium is a little bit more yellow, this looks like radium.

 

47 bids and went for 4,120 Euros. Some people must have really liked it.