Thoughts on this watch for first Omega: http://www.ebay.com/itm/121322366346?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:ITPurchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network

also, are later '60's more reliable than late '60's-70's?
or in general which vintage years are most desireable In regards to function etc?


<Edit , Topic moved to its own thread.>

 

Thanks for the info.. Is the 561 number stamped and visible on the movement?

 

and be redial you mean reprinted? They state all original, but it's common that sellers with high ratings misrepresent the details ?
what was the tipoff since the pics are poor quality?

 

That one definitely is a redial, and redialed in a wrong way.

 

I agree, 561 may be the caliber, it may not, why is the bridge a different colour to the rest of the movement?
Why is there no shot of hands moving if the watch is working, especially second hand?
Why has the Ω logo moved to the left of the cross hair?

I'd pass on it.

 

That watch is a dog with fleas...run away as fast as you can!

 

Oh wow I was actually high bidder on this for a couple days . I don't know what I was thinking. Thankfully I've been outbid