Forums Latest Members
  1. sulaco Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    597
    Likes
    405
    I know it´s bit late but i just wanted to know if i did ok with this one.
    It is a very late 105.012 serial starts with 260
    so it even could be that bezel and hands are correct.
    What do you say?
     
    $_57.jpg
  2. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    26,988
    Likes
    32,694
    26M serial on a 105.012?
     
  3. sulaco Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    597
    Likes
    405
    yup, if i didn´t see it wrong on the pictures, have to wait until i receive it.
    It is a 66 thou, so serial should be in the higher end
     
  4. Gavin It's the quiet ones you have to 'watch' out for. Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    2,399
    Likes
    4,466
    Saw the listing. Serial too late for a 66. Replacement bezel and chrono hand at least? No pic of crown in original listing.
     
  5. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    26,988
    Likes
    32,694
    Haven't seen higher than 25.44 before, that serial combined with the bezel and hands would concern me a bit
     
  6. sulaco Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    597
    Likes
    405
    I am not concerned yet... at least the case is nice and i find the lume does match quite well. Bezel also looks well used so if it was changed, it did happen in the early years of this watch .
     
  7. pascs Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    1,634
    Likes
    5,657
    My 105.012-66 CB is a 2495 xxxx serial. Pushers look like the shorter ones which are correct for the CB case. My dial has the narrower T Swiss Made T
     
  8. marturx Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    2,266
    Likes
    4,214
    Bought a 105.012-66 CB last week, and it is 24,9 mill
     
  9. scook94 Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    115
    Likes
    102
    Is it true that the 321 cal ceased to be made in 1960 and serial numbers were added based on the subsequent year they were "expected" to be sold?
     
  10. sulaco Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    597
    Likes
    405
    Still have to learn about these vintage watches
    But the price was tempting and if it isnt what it looks like i will tear it apart and sell the parts
     
  11. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    26,988
    Likes
    32,694
    If it were me I'd be pulling an extract on the serial to verify the reference, if it confirms 105.012 it'll be an interesting outlying data point, if not it'll tell you a lot more about the history of the watch
     
    lando, MikiJ, marturx and 2 others like this.
  12. Davidt Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    10,419
    Likes
    18,126
    I had that saved I my watch list to see where it went. Do you have a return option? As above Id get an extract with a view to returning if it comes back as a transplanted movement.

    The hands and bezel can be sourced if you got it at a decent price but if it's a complete Franken it'd be too much for me.
     
    ICONO likes this.
  13. sulaco Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    597
    Likes
    405
    As soon as i got it, i will provide more detailed pics. The serial is hard to read from the pictures it could also be starting with 250...... We just have to wait a couple of days until it arrives.
     
  14. sulaco Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    597
    Likes
    405
    I got use for the dial because my 145.012 has all the lume scratched off.
    But i still have hope that it is what i believe, a very very late 105.012 ... in that case even the second hand and the bezel could still be orginal. On the other hand it could be a 105.012 which had a serious service end of the 60ties and bezel, hands, dial could have been swapped.
     
  15. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    26,988
    Likes
    32,694
    Bezel wouldn't be even if it were very late, even 145.022-69s in the 29M range have DON
     
    MikiJ likes this.
  16. Davidt Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    10,419
    Likes
    18,126
    Hopefully your right and the movement comes back ok.

    Even in the worse case scenario it sounds like you have a use for the dial and if it is a franken, there's no real shame in breaking it up for parts. I'm sure a CB case and the 321 would interest a few people.

    Have to agree that the hands and bezel certainly aren't original though.

    Keep us posted, good luck!
     
  17. sulaco Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    597
    Likes
    405
    Most certainly you are right about the bezel.
    I just checked the extract of records of my 145.012-67 which has a serial starting with 260 too, in fact it is just 7000 units apart from the serial of the 105.012.It was produced in
    68 thou.
    I really hope i couldnt read the number right and it is 250 instead of 260 :rolleyes:.
    But always look at the bright side... i love the dial and the case. ;)
     
  18. Mothra Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    1,634
    Likes
    1,111
    Franken or not, that's actually a nice looking watch; given full disclosure in any further sale, it would seem a shame to break it....
     
    watchyouwant, pascs and Spacefruit like this.
  19. timeismoney Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    1,301
    Likes
    2,859
    I agree with Mothra. The watch is a nice looking one and you should wear it and enjoy it for what it is.
     
  20. richardew Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    446
    Likes
    530
    ID s/n watch purchase date date from extract of the archives model year model source
    109 22.824.329 105.012-64 29-Dec-64 chrono 24
    21 18.945.447 105.012-66 1966 antiquourum
    32 20.521.391 105.012-63 forum
    52 22.089.xxx 105.012 06-Dec-65 NASA
    53 22.089.xxx 105.012 20-Dec-65 NASA Cernan
    54 22.824.217 105.012-64 1964 antiquourum
    57 24.002.xxx 105.012-65 12-Aug-66 NASA Armstrong
    58 24.002.xxx 105.012-65 12-Aug-66 NASA Bean
    59 24.002.xxx 105.012-65 12-Aug-66 NASA Brand
    60 24.002.xxx 105.012-65 12-Aug-66 NASA Cernan
    61 24.003.xxx 105.012-65 12-Aug-66 NASA Brand
    62 24.003.xxx 105.012-65 12-Aug-66 NASA Carr
    63 24.003.xxx 105.012-65 12-Aug-66 NASA Conrad
    64 24.003.xxx 105.012-65 12-Aug-66 NASA Mattingly
    67 24.012.525 105.012-65 1965 antiquourum
    68 24.013.716 105.012-65 1965 antiquourum
    71 24.042.821 105.012-65 ebay
    76 24.950.xxx 105.012-66 01-Jun-67 1966 forum
    77 24.951.xxx 105.012-66 27-Jun-67 1966 forum
    78 24.952.916 105.012-66 1966 antiquourum
    80 24.957.xxx 105.012-66 07-Nov-67 NASA Bean
    81 24.957.xxx 105.012-66 07-Nov-67 NASA Borman
    82 24.957.xxx 105.012-66 07-Nov-67 NASA Gibson
    83 24.957.xxx 105.012-66 07-Nov-67 NASA Gordon
    84 24.957.xxx 105.012-66 07-Nov-67 NASA Schweickart
    85 24.957.xxx 105.012-66 07-Nov-67 NASA Slayton
    86 24.957.xxx 105.012-66 07-Nov-67 NASA Slayton
    87 24.958.098 105.012-66 forum
    90 25.447.907 105.012-63 18-Mar-68 1963 antiquourum

    Above is a list of 105.012 s/n that I have collected off the internet. With the exception of the last one on the list, the s/n's are all less than 25 xxx xxx. The bezel is incorrect. The hands are incorrect. The dial looks like it might have been relumed. I think it is a Franken in a CB case.
     
    alfanator likes this.