Forums Latest Members
  1. Stewart H Honorary NJ Resident Sep 12, 2014

    Posts
    3,070
    Likes
    3,510
    I guess I was just lucky with the Arsa and then the GP Mk II, that they did not suffer from creep. I am glad that I have encountered these problems because they are testing my diagnostic and problem solving skills and are being stored in the memory for future use - without being pushed, we learn nothing other than robotic procedures.

    The Omega method seems stupid to me because if there is a problem, you have to un-case the movement and remove the hands and dial, then replace them etc. Al's way was just instinctive to me, as I'm sure it would be to any engineer.

    Of course, I could say that I used the official Omega method with the Soccer Timer :whistling:

    ..... but I didn't. I just cocked up.

    With creep:
    With Creep.jpg

    Without creep
    Without Creep.jpg
     
  2. Stewart H Honorary NJ Resident Sep 12, 2014

    Posts
    3,070
    Likes
    3,510
    Back to the project:

    Nearly there:

    Nearly There.jpg
     
    Ascalon and ChrisN like this.
  3. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Sep 12, 2014

    Posts
    26,463
    Likes
    65,604
    Keep in mind the Omega procedures assume an experienced watchmaker, so although I use my own little test to confirm things, I can basically tell by looking at it if it's going to creep or not.

    Also note that Omega's Work Instruction 48 sets out efficiency standards for the workshop, and they expect a complete maintenance service done on a Cal. 861 Speedmaster (start to finish) to take just 3.5 hours. So letting it sit with the dial off for 1 or 2 hours is not really something they can do and keep to their efficiency requirements, so with the dial on they can see the creep in just a few minutes. Then again an experienced person can remove hands, dial, make adjustment, and then put it all back together in a few minutes. In this context it's not as "out there" as it seems.

    For me I am a "multitasker" when I'm servicing, so I have a dozen movements on the go at any one time. I usually have something in the cleaning machine, and a watch on the timing machine, and something I'm working on at the bench - all at the same time, plus others at various stages of assembly or testing. Setting aside the chronograph for an hour or two is not a problem because I just work on something else while I'm checking this.

    When I was in NJ at the service center it did not seem to work that way at all, and most of the watchmakers there seemed to work on just one movement at a time. Note that they don't even perform the dial and hand installation, or the casing the of the movement. They don't do any of that stuff (either assembling or disassembling the watch from the case, hands, dial), as people hired off the street are given training for these tasks, and the watchmaker just works on the movement.

    Oh, and maybe the angle, but the hand alignment looks to be a tad off (to the left in each case) on minute, hour, and central recorders....

    Cheers, Al
     
  4. Stewart H Honorary NJ Resident Sep 12, 2014

    Posts
    3,070
    Likes
    3,510
    The hands have been re-set.

    As phase one (the "easy" bit) is now over, all that remains is to offer a big "Thank you" to Al for his advice and open criticism. This has definitely stopped me cutting corners I, otherwise, would have.

    Phase two is to try to restore the edges, by hand, to the case which is horribly rounded.

    There is one, last, question I have and that is regarding the crystal. On the GP Mk II, it had the original crystal with the plastic, crystal gasket, but the "new" crystal I got, with this watch, takes an O ring gasket, set into a groove in the centre of the crystal. Without the O ring, the crystal will drop straight in but the O ring adds quite a lot to the diameter of the assembly, compared to the old plastic gasket.

    I have read horror stories of people trying to fit this revised crystal so, Al, are there any tricks to fitting the crystal - lubricate the gasket with washing up liquid or something else?

    Again, thanks.

    Stewart
     
    Ascalon likes this.
  5. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Sep 12, 2014

    Posts
    26,463
    Likes
    65,604
    Hi Stewart,

    Glad I could help, and I appreciate that you took my comments as just wanting to see the job done the best it can be. When you have gone through some formal training, I think you get used to being criticized, so it sort of rolls off your back. But I understand not everyone can take it as well as you have, so I'm glad you saw my posts as productive and constructive.

    I have rather vivid memories of everyone in class having to march their chronographs to the front instructor's bench one by one after the hands were installed, and the instructor putting them under a 50X microscope that was connected to a video camera and monitor in the room - everyone could see how good (or bad) you were at installing hands. ;)

    This was done for other tasks as well, so it was a pretty routine thing in the training I have had.

    Before you case the movement, start, let the watch run for a few minutes to get the hands out of their home positions, then stop and reset the hands - I do this at least 10 times with the central recorder stopping at different locations around the dial to make sure they don't move when reset.

    The crystal - these are a royal pain. You can try using some silicone grease to see if it will slide in, but for this and some other similar cases (Flightmaster for example) there is a tool that is similar to a piston ring compressor. It compresses that O-ring, and allows the crystal and ring to be pressed in more easily. I actually have not been able to get one of these tools, and the tech gurus at Omega here in Canada have not been able to find one for me, so at this point when I get watches like this in, I just send it off to Omega to have them drop the crystals in for me - they usually do it free of charge.

    If you try to just press it in, the crystal may break near the groove, so proceed with caution.

    Cheers, Al
     
  6. Stewart H Honorary NJ Resident Sep 12, 2014

    Posts
    3,070
    Likes
    3,510
    Once again, thanks Al. I have no problem with constructive criticism even when it is open to however many billions of people on the internet.

    The engineer in me says to reverse the process and press the case onto the crystal, so I'll try that first. If all else fails, It sounds like I might have to buy a new crystal from STS and get them to fit it. It just pains me (and I'm sure it does you, too) than something this mundane can't be done without outside help.
     
  7. pascs Sep 13, 2014

    Posts
    1,634
    Likes
    5,657
    I would say there is 0% chance of you pushing it in, the edge of the case is sharp and not chamfered like some, it will tear up the o-ring for sure

    I have one of those tools for the MKII crystal, an ebay find a few months back :thumbsup: Havent used it yet though.

    Before I had this tool I made a plastic sleeve which achieves the same thing. Its a cone shape made from hard plastic from a large plastic bottle. Its small end is just the same size as the crystal and as you push down on the crystal it compresses the o-ring and then both can be pushed into the case without damaging the o-ring. A bit fiddly but works ok and works in the same fashion to the genuine one except that it has a small lip on the inside to hold the o-ring in place just before you push it into the case - I think this just makes sure that the crystal is totally flat before it enters the case

    Also I found that if I didnt get the crystal 100% aligned when I installed it, I could turn the crystal the 1/2mm it needed using one of those rubber case openers to push down on the crystal and turn it, it is a very tight fit

    edit: A picture of the tool if you're interested how it looks ............my alternative on the right, the base is totally flat and smooth, i just didnt bother too much with the top edge :p

    [​IMG]
     
  8. Stewart H Honorary NJ Resident Sep 13, 2014

    Posts
    3,070
    Likes
    3,510
    Thanks. I'll rummage around tomorrow to see what I can use to make one.
     
  9. Stewart H Honorary NJ Resident Sep 14, 2014

    Posts
    3,070
    Likes
    3,510
    A morning of tool making…

    Refusing to be beaten and with thanks to pascs for his picture and inspiration, I spent a good hour rummaging around for suitable materials, armed only with imagination and a Vernier caliper. Dismissing various plastic containers as too wide, too narrow, not thick enough etc. I stumbled on an old, half litre, household plant sprayer – the type with a bulbous bottom and a long, slowly tapering neck (no, not J. Lo.) hidden at the back of the cupboard under the sink. Perfect.

    This is what’s left of it but I’m sure you know the type I mean.

    Sprayer.jpg


    Knowing that the diameter of the crystal is 36.5mm and that the base of the tool has to be perfectly flat, I needed some kind of former to make the get it level. So, having hacksawed the neck off at an appropriate length (leaving enough to be able to hold the work) I found the perfect former in the shape of a 25mm socket with an o.d. of 33.71mm. Going this small meant I would have more finishing to do but also meant that there was more room for error as I only had one sprayer. Jamming the socket inside the sprayer neck, I used a Stanley knife to trim the plastic down (in stages) until the bottom surface was perfectly aligned with the face of the socket – remembering to keep checking that the socket was centred inside.

    Now I needed a perfectly flat working surface so that I could grind the plastic down to the right level and this turned out to be the ceramic hob in my kitchen. Starting with 40 grit aluminium oxide paper I took the length of the work down a little at a time, regularly checking the i.d. with both the caliper and the crystal. I moved onto 80 grit as the bulk of the material was removed and finished with 120 grit wet & dry. The crystal is now a perfect fit and the caliper shows 36.50mm. I then trimmed the top of the tool (as I then considered it) to give a height of 10mm. As pascs rightly observes, the top doesn’t need to be perfect so the fact that it varies in height between 9.8mm and 10.3mm doesn’t matter. I did sand the top down though, just to improve appearances.

    Tool 1.jpg
    Tool 2.jpg
    Tool 3.jpg
    Tool 4.jpg
    Tool 5.jpg
    Tool 6.jpg

    Now for the moment of truth, a trial fitting of the crystal. Into the tool with the gasket on and pressed down onto a flat surface – perfect. Offer it up to the watch case (that I still have to work on) – that’s awkward because you no longer have a centring reference because the Tachy ring is a thin, printed film on the back of the crystal. Apply pressure and…

    …cracking sounds. ::censored:: This tool needs re-thinking. As the Tachy ring is at the point of contact, there is no hiding this so it means a new crystal. At least that one came with the watch but it does mean that I have something to experiment with.

    The problem arises from alignment so I need to come up with a way of overcoming this “blindness”. The crystal is 3mm thick and the 0.8mm groove for the gasket is 1.6mm from the top and 0.6mm from the bottom so it occurred to me that I need a way of getting the bottom of the crystal to sit up to 0.6mm (no more) below the bottom of the tool.

    More hunting around, this time armed with a micrometre, looking for something solid, flat and less than 0.6mm thick. Then I stumbled across a hard plastic luggage tag that I picked up at the London Ski Show a few years ago. The clear side was 0.5mm thick – thank you Ski New Hampshire. Drawing around both the inside and outside edges of the tool, all I needed to do was to cut out between the two lines and the crystal will pass through but the tool will not. The hole doesn’t need to be perfectly round, it just has to be inside of the outer line. Try with the damaged crystal, separate the two parts and it works nicely. There is a nice 0.5mm of crystal poking out from the bottom of the tool. So I offer it up to the case and the protruding crystal locates into the hole perfectly. Apply pressure and…

    …the crystal slides in. Knock it out, try it again and…

    …job’s a good ‘un.

    Plate 1.jpg
    Plate 2.jpg
    Plate 3.jpg

    OK, it has cost me £38 for a new crystal but it is very satisfying to have realised the problem, thought of the solution and manufactured the tool.

    I have put this down in such detail, partly because of the honest and open way this thread about my project has evolved – warts and all – but also so that anybody wanting to make their own tool can do so without having to worry about the problems I encountered.


    In use, I would suggest loading the crystal into the tool so that it is flat at the bottom and then placing it over the spacing plate and pressing again to achieve the protrusion. Of course I can’t guarantee that you won’t break your crystal if you copy my idea but it will certainly help you avoid doing so.
     
  10. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Sep 14, 2014

    Posts
    26,463
    Likes
    65,604
    Nicely done - not pretty but functional. Making tools and parts is part of being a watchmaker for sure. In another thread someone mentioned a dial protector you can purchase to protect the dial while removing hands. I have yet to meet any professional who has ever bought such a thing, although I am sure they are out there - making them yourself allows you to customize it to fit the specific purpose at hand.

    I recently needed to make a movement spacer, and I found that plastic electrical conduit couplings were a good place to start on the lathe:

    [​IMG]

    Worked out well:

    [​IMG]

    Cheers, Al
     
    Ascalon, VictorAlpha and John R Smith like this.
  11. pascs Sep 14, 2014

    Posts
    1,634
    Likes
    5,657
    Stewart, thats definitely more professional looking than mine :thumbsup:

    The 0.5mm flat plate is just used to get the crystal to stick out by a uniform 0.5mm, then you remove it and place the crystal up to the case and push it in?

    The metal original one I have, has an inner lip into which the o-ring goes when the crystal is at the bottom. I'm thinking that when the o-ring is in this groove, than 0.5mm of crystal sticks out of the bottom of the tool allowing the crystal to line up into the case - I've not used the metal tool yet so I'm just guessing this based on your experiences.
     
  12. Stewart H Honorary NJ Resident Sep 14, 2014

    Posts
    3,070
    Likes
    3,510
    Mine only looks better because of the material I was forced to use.

    Yes. The only use for the plate is to get the uniform protrusion, then it is removed.

    It would be interesting (to me, any way) to see your proper tool from the back. From how you describe it, I would think you are right
     
  13. pascs Sep 14, 2014

    Posts
    1,634
    Likes
    5,657
    Not so easy to take a picture but hope this helps

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Stewart H likes this.
  14. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Sep 15, 2014

    Posts
    15,489
    Likes
    32,377
  15. ChrisN Sep 25, 2014

    Posts
    2,218
    Likes
    4,756
    Just catching up after a much needed holiday. Great explanation of how you made that tool Stewart. I use a spare front Jaguar brake disc (don't ask why I have unused spares...) when I need a planar surface. I'm not too sure how my wife would react to me using the ceramic hob but, not well I suspect!:(

    Cheers, Chris
     
  16. rogart ray it again, Ram. Sep 28, 2014

    Posts
    1,007
    Likes
    408
    Impressive work .
     
  17. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Nov 4, 2014

    Posts
    26,463
    Likes
    65,604
    Just bringing back this thread to post this procedure I found on a member's only Yahoo group for watchmakers that shows the procedure for fitting crystals in the Mk II, Flightmaster, etc. cases.

    No idea who the original author is, but it might come in handy for anyone doing this sort of work.

    [​IMG]

    Cheers, Al
     
    jawkdna, Spacefruit, Tritium and 2 others like this.
  18. ketiljo Nov 5, 2014

    Posts
    304
    Likes
    480
    Great thread! Thanks to all contributors. This may come out handy at some point.
     
  19. davidswiss Nov 6, 2014

    Posts
    1,078
    Likes
    1,808
    Tremendous post thank you. Appreciate the explanations and pictures.
     
  20. yande Nov 6, 2014

    Posts
    513
    Likes
    1,237
    I've read this thread a couple of times. It is still my Favourite Omega Forums Thread, to date. Grateful thanks to all that contributed..