Forums Latest Members
  1. wwhntr Jul 19, 2014

    Posts
    542
    Likes
    365
    The Omega Vintage Database indicates the cal 344 was COSC. Were all cal 344 chronometre grade or were they made in both non-chronometre and chronometre versions? I am have seen hundreds of watches in the cal 35X series, but I am not very familiar with this cal.
     
  2. John R Smith Jul 19, 2014

    Posts
    1,320
    Likes
    726
    Interesting. The OVD often lists the cal 342 and 344 in sequence, with the 344 as COSC. However, I have found several examples of cal 344 on eBay, and so far none of them have been chronometer rated. It may be, that as with cal 354, some were and some were not ::confused2::
     
  3. pitpro Likes the game. Jul 19, 2014

    Posts
    3,073
    Likes
    3,552
    I have a 344 powered 1953 Seamaster that is not certified or marked
    as Chronometer. But I can tell you it keeps Chronometer grade time.
    If I recall correctly, the 344 was considered "Chronometer grade" but
    not certified. Omega referred to the 352, 333, 343 as "deluxe execution"
    chronometrer grade movements in comparison to the later caliber 354, 344
    that using a swan neck regulation and standard finish wheels.
    The 354 was based off the 352, and the 344 was based off the 343, 28.10 JUB series
    The bulk of the 28.10 derivitive Chronometers were made between 1952 and 1955 .
    I'm sure I got something wrong here. Corrections welcome.
     
  4. MSNWatch Vintage Omega Aficionado Staff Member Jul 19, 2014

    Posts
    6,533
    Likes
    10,835
    Agreed- 344 never a chronometre while 343 always a chronometre.
     
  5. John R Smith Jul 19, 2014

    Posts
    1,320
    Likes
    726
    This may be just another strange blip in the Omega database, there are quite a few.