Forums Latest Members
  1. SpikiSpikester @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 14, 2012

    Posts
    3,185
    Likes
    3,774
    During all the Speedmaster hunting, I frequently came across 1967 case backs marked "145.012-67SP" as well as the more orthodox "145.012-67" marking.

    Also, Watchco were selling off what they described as NOS case backs with the "145.012-67SP" marking.

    At first, I speculated that this may have indicated a service part but I'm not so sure about that now. And I haven't seen the "SP" on any other Speedy case back. It only seems to appear on the 145.012-67 models - not any other year of the 145.012 or on any other model ref.

    So - does anyone know what it is & what it signifies (if anything) :confused:
     
  2. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 14, 2012

    Posts
    26,949
    Likes
    32,636
    I read somewhere ages ago that the SP meant "service part" as in a replacement... but I'm not 100% on that.
     
  3. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 14, 2012

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    If you were considering a Watchco back; as your watch is a collector piece and the original back will always follow the watch, I would consider a Thomas Priek display back instead. Inexpensive and a great way to view and show off the movement
     
    Tritium likes this.
  4. richardew Nov 14, 2012

    Posts
    446
    Likes
    530
    I don't think it stands for service part. Here is service part translated into french, german and italian. Most of the caseback inscription is in french.
    German Service-Teil
    French pièce de service
    italian parte Ricambio
     
  5. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 14, 2012

    Posts
    26,949
    Likes
    32,636
    I have a Thomas Priek caseback on mine and would totally second that, its a brilliant option, and the Cal 321 is a movement that needs showing off.
     
  6. SpikiSpikester @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 14, 2012

    Posts
    3,185
    Likes
    3,774
    Will look into the Priek case backs, but the original query wasn't because I am looking to replace the case back - more of a quest to find out why only this model and year have SP added to the ref in some cases.
     
    Moviken likes this.
  7. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Nov 14, 2012

    Posts
    12,194
    Likes
    15,696
    Could "SP" mean "Speedmaster Professional", or "Speedmaster" (if pre-Pro)?
    gatorcpa
     
  8. richardew Nov 14, 2012

    Posts
    446
    Likes
    530
    I think we need some input from someone who speaks french since most of the casback is in french.
     
  9. SpikiSpikester @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 15, 2012

    Posts
    3,185
    Likes
    3,774
    One of my team at work is French, so I have asked. Initial feedback is that if SP signifies "service part" then in French the adjective would come first, so the abbreviation would be "PS".

    We are investigating further, to see if there is any similar phrase or meaning that would result in a "SP" abbreviation. Beyond that, we will be into the realms of guesswork without any other clues or ideas.

    Gator's idea that it may be Speedmaster Professional might be closer to the mark, especially if it was something only included by a particular supplier - but that is pure specuation on my part.
     
  10. Dash1 Nov 15, 2012

    Posts
    1,824
    Likes
    3,501
    Do the case-back's marked 'SP' also have a makers mark? I think all Speedmasters have case makers stamps, eg. 'C.B'; 'H.F' and others - could it be the makers mark?
     
  11. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 15, 2012

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    From Omega, via Desmond. May or may not be relevant.

    BA Yellow gold
    BC White gold
    BG Pink gold
    BT platinum
    DA Yellow gold combination
    DD gold combination
    DG pink gold combination
    DL gold combination
    MD gold plated
    SP Strap <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
    ST Stainless steel
    TA titanium and gold
    TI titanium
    TL titanium and pink gole
    Y

    Note: Sometimes this code is stamped before the case number…
     
  12. Dash1 Nov 15, 2012

    Posts
    1,824
    Likes
    3,501
    Nice one! I reckon that explains it.
     
  13. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 15, 2012

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    Maybe, but I'm not quite ready to say that myself. Perhaps Desmond may have some insight.

    If only Chuck were here :(
     
  14. richardew Nov 15, 2012

    Posts
    446
    Likes
    530
    That is not correct. You have a bunch of metal codes for the case (BA, BC, etc) and then SP for the strap which has nothing to do with the case and what it is made of. These codes go in front of the model number ie., ST 145.022-69, etc. Here is the complete table of case metal codes and there is no SP listed.
    http://www.omega-fanatic.com/media/.gallery/image254.jpg
    The french for strap = sangle.
     
  15. Dash1 Nov 15, 2012

    Posts
    1,824
    Likes
    3,501
    Good point. So could it be the makers mark?
     
  16. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 15, 2012

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    What is not correct? I don't "have" anything
    Whether it has any relevance is questionable. I stated that . If you have any question about the list's correctness, take it up with Desmond who published it and quoted Chuck Maddox as the source. http://users.tpg.com.au/mondodec//aCaseStudydefinitive.pdf page 23.

    In the mean time I will keep searching for a definitive answer, as no one has produced one yet.
     
  17. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 15, 2012

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    Another interesting piece of uncertain relevance.

    http://www.chronocentric.com/forums/omega/index.cgi?md=read;id=59168

    "I just had my Constellation serviced. It was quite expensive, IMO -
    : they wanted around USD900 for the job which did involve getting
    : parts from Omega (that alone took a couple of months). The watch
    : looks fine - I hope it keeps time as well as it used to.
    : I tried to get into Omega's Vintage Watch web pages, but failed. It
    : seems they are working on the site, and some parts are
    : unavailable. Maybe you can help? I bought the watch in 1969 (the
    : price (without strap) was approx. USD125 at the time!). Can you
    : tell me the production year, and any other particulars for this
    : watch?
    : The caliber is 564, the Ref.# is CD 168 017 SP, and the serial# is
    : 264 05 737.
    : --
    : Aage J.
    ++
    This is the Omega Vintage Database entry.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Constellation - "C"
    Gents' leather strap
    Reference
    BA 168.009 =168.017
    International collection
    1966
    Movement
    Type: Automatic chronometer certified
    Caliber number: 561 / 564
    Cal. 561
    Created in 1958, 24 jewels
    Cal. 564
    Created in 1965, 24 jewels
    Functions
    Date, Chronometer
    Case
    18K solid yellow gold
    Case back
    Screw-in
    Full metal
    Dial
    Solid gold dial with gold hour markers and gold hands.
    Crystal
    Armoured hesalite
    Bracelet
    Leather
    Water resistance
    30 meters
    This watch may have existed with different dials.
    More product information
    Case : "C" shape (35 mm diameter), 18K solid yellow gold
    For leather straps of 19 mm lug-size
    International Collection : 1967-1972
    Swiss retail price (1971) : CHF 1'550.-
    Also available on 18K solid gold bracelet under ref. BA 368.4044 (CHF 3'240.- in 1967).
    Also available in 18K solid pink gold (BB 168.009, CHF 1'550.-) or in 18K solid white gold (BC 168.009).
    JLM
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    The serial number indicates an age of approximately (+/- 3 years) of 1968.
    The CD and SP in the case reference is a metal code and manufacturer indicator. SP indicates "strap". I will assume you have a stainless steel watch.
    There is an alternative OVD listing . . .
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Constellation - "C"
    Gents' leather strap
    Reference
    ST 168.009 =168.017
    International collection
    1967
    Movement
    Type: Automatic chronometer certified
    Caliber number: 561
    Created in 1958
    24 jewels
    Central sweep-second hand
    Functions
    Date, Chronometer
    Case
    Stainless steel
    Case back
    Screw-in
    Full metal
    Dial
    With gold hour markers and gold hands
    Crystal
    Armoured hesalite
    Bracelet
    Leather
    Water resistance
    30 meters
    This watch may have existed with different dials.
    More product information
    Case : round (35 mm diameter)
    For leather straps of 19 mm lug-size
    International Collection : 1967-1972
    Swiss retail price (1971) : CHF 480.-
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    At the 1971 exchange rates, CHF 480 = US$117.
    At current exchange rates, it is more like US$510 (the dollar has lost a lot of value);
    adjusted for inflation, about $2,500.
    Further, add a luxury premium of say 40% (Swiss watches were a premium brand of a necessity, now they are clearly an expensive luxury) and
    you get a price of about $3,500 in today's dollars.
    Pretty comparable to an AquaTerra before the latest upmarket moves by Omega . . . .
    Messages In"
     
  18. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Nov 15, 2012

    Posts
    12,194
    Likes
    15,696
    Maybe you should assume the title of "InvestiGator" now.

    Although in reading that post, it seems that the strap comment was from Sam and not part of the OVD listing.

    Not sure why there would be any difference between a caseback for a strap watch or a bracelet. Even today, the difference is simply in the stock code, and not on the actual caseback.

    We may have an answer, or we may not.
    gatorcpa
     
  19. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Nov 15, 2012

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    Nope, "InvestiGopher" wouldn't have the same ring to it. :D
     
    hondaman likes this.
  20. ulackfocus Nov 15, 2012

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,972
    Since you were only throwing out a few things that you found and not stating them as fact, I think "HypotheGopher" is more apropos.